Who says they didn’t ?
 |
| do you believe what our FEDERALES say ? That they could have had him any day ? |
After all, I believe that Gabe Wortman had a habit of chasing away kids from the public sidewalk in front of his two Dartmouth home, sometimes beating them up.
But I “know” for sure about that only in one instance, when an attack on Matt M that resulted in the child going to hospital, cost GW a hefty - wait for it ! - $50 fine.
Its on the public record.
What evidence do the RCMP have that GW was a smuggler, as opposed to them merely “believing” he was smuggler ?
Probably its best that we all ask a person who was on the Fredericton police force at the time and had been there since 1985 and remained there till 2019 when she retired as police chief.
Wortman Public Inquiry commissioner Leann Fitch....
Yep. This is the Orwellian analysis that is needed. I noticed this when I read the RCMP release as well. Along with the "context" they should have mentioned about the warrant document was they included those comments about Gabriel having those pills and etc because they believed it to be true and were using it as the reason to request a warrant right? Hawryluk mentions that herself in writing up the document. On top of dropping the definition of "organized crime" and vague references to: "Any transactions of firearms on the part of the gunman or anyone else remains part of the active investigation. As such, no further details in relation" etc. 1. The anyone else they refer to, for all I know they're talking without talking about Lisa Banfield again and 2. The author of this document should be ashamed for the atrocities they commit against the English language to hide lying and yet somehow tippin your hand and positioning your cards in a way that the public can see them in the reflection of your sunglasses. Looks like you've got more aces than fit in one deck.
ReplyDelete