 |
| In public, Republicans dream about being SHOWERED in GOLD : but in private ? |
Germaphobic Billionaire Trump can’t seem to get past this persistent connection between himself and Golden Showers which basically is the state of being sexually aroused by tinkling on other people or by being tinkled upon yourself.
Yet, on the surface, the GOP membership would seem to be all about making money : showers of gold coins.
In America, the desire to make billions is very surface : tens of millions people openly state that is their main goal in life while hundreds of millions of their fellow Americans applaud them.
Equally, in GOP America, sexual activities of anything but the most vanilla nature between a married man and woman are highly taboo, highly secret.
Constantly talking about the need to repress and ban non-vanilla sexual urges is thus the most profitable way to get ahead within the GOP, the way to make money.
Except it frequently turns out that it is always the GOPers who talk most frequently about banning various sexual “sins” who are the ones secretly doing it the most. Big Shout-Out to GOP-Evangelical power couple Becki & Jerry Falwell & their threesomes with “Jesus” ....Fernandez, Jr.
Far then from accurately reflecting a revulsion against the “germs” of urine, Trump‘s constant and even obsessive concern about avoiding washroom germs might thus instead reflect a lifelong fascination with washrooms as the secret sites of The Donald’s sexual pleasures....
"Sexuality is a rich repository of self-deceptive thinking. In an amusing experimental study that is widely cited in the literature, two groups of heterosexual men were shown a variety of erotic films. 42 One group consisted of men who were comfortable in the presence of homosexual s, while the second consisted entirely of homophobic men. Each group viewed a selection of graphic films depicting homosexual, lesbian, and heterosexual erotica. They were also connected to a plethysmograph, a device that measures subtle changes in the circumference of the penis. The plethysmographic readings demonstrated that the lesbian and heterosexual films excited both groups of men, but that only the homophobic men were physically aroused by the homosexual films. However, when experimenters asked them, all of the homophobic men flatly denied that the sight of men having sex with one another had stimulated them. Of course, it is possible that they were lying, but it is also possible that they were deceiving themselves about their own sexual responses. If this suggestion seems implausible now, it will seem less so by the time you have finished reading this book." - David Livingstone Smith ,(Why we lie)
ReplyDelete